Blog Archives

To the reader that asked me for help for her mom who got vaxxed and now has blood clots...

1/29/2022

Re: Please Help Me
I always answer emails and saw your book request with the please help me subject line but I accidentally deleted your email because I was messing with my phone while driving. I apologize. I am so mad at myself, this never happens. PLEASE email me again and I will get my books to you.
-John

0 Comments

Clarifying the confusion surrounding the use of terms such as 'virus' and 'exosome'

1/29/2022

1 Comment

One of the reasons I have not posted as many articles this month is because I am currently finishing up a second edition of my last book "What Now? Recovering From A Tragic Mistake." For those of you who have already received the first edition, to put your mind at ease, there will be nothing added to the second edition that changes the advice or specific recommendations I make, so you do not necessarily have to read this second version. Its not that much different, it just includes a few things I thought needed to be in there to make the overall book a bit better, and the passage below is such an example.

The book addresses covid vaccine injury as a primary focus but also provides some general information that is relevant to that topic. I assert repeatedly in it that viruses do not exist throughout the book but I never said what I think they are, and I noticed much later that is something that should be in there someplace.

So, to clear that up once and for all, I think viruses are exosomes, that the two terms are frequently considered synonyms, but one must also be clear about all the capabilities that are either properly or falsely attributed to each. This is the topic I am covering today and the passages below will be added to the second edition.

What I strongly feel needs to happen is the entire field of study needs to start over. The medical establishment has built a giant house of cards upon a number of assumptions that do not stand up to serious examination. All such assumptions should be rigorously vetted according to sound scientific principles. What has come to be accepted over the years has been almost entirely driven by the pharmaceutical industrial complex in their pursuit of profit. Making money is not the purpose of medicine, the fact that is has been has led us astray.

Based on all my research into all of this it is my conclusion that viruses are exosomes, that the two terms are frequently considered synonyms, and this is incorrect. To properly define these terms one must be clear about all the capabilities that are either properly or falsely attributed to each. This is the topic I am covering in this chapter. This information was not part of the first edition of this book, which was only a rough draft and never officially published in hard copy form, so hopefully that will not be a problem for readers of this edition.

The way the term 'virus' is commonly used it refers to a kind of capsule with messages. I like to think of these structures, rather unceremoniously, as a mailbag, and the proper term for this mailbag is 'exosome'. I use the analogy of a mailbag not because it is a perfect description, but because a mailbag is something most people can relate to. Normally, these mailbags/exosomes/viruses just contains junk mail, not explosive devices, so the way the term 'virus' is commonly used, everyone believes them to be something not only reactive, but dangerous, in other words, a pathogen. And there is no medical data that can differentiate a virus from an exosome. Observationally, and in the minds of many experts, they are one and the same. Functionally, the two terms describe structures that are very different.

Virologists are frequently labeling artifacts that result from the preparations they do prior to using various forms of equipment, such as electron microscopy, and calling those artifacts viruses. Other times they use the term "virus" to describe structures that only form as a result of their culturing procedures. Occasionally, they are applying the term to exosomes, a needless distinction and an erroneous one as well. Exosomes are not dangerous in the way they believe, and their presence simply informs us of a process that is going on in the body or culture in which they are observed.

Exosome creation is a natural bodily response. Virologists see these things and mistakenly conclude their presence is unnatural, that they somehow randomly exploited some available means to enter the body from outside the body, and that seeing more than one is evidence of reproduction in the way we understand normal cellular reproduction, which is not only incorrect, it borders on lying. I say that because at the same time, the evidence they provide to prove 'viruses' bud off the detritus in their cultures, they claim, is "proof viruses reproduce, and they must know budding is not the same process as cell division. If they don't know this, it is further evidence that virologists are simply incompetent in the extreme.

The result here in terms of definitions is that everything virologists are looking at and all the assumed processes they believe to be happening when "viruses spread" just corrupt the meaning of cellular reproduction, with the common inference being that viruses reproduce and "spread".

To eliminate the confusion my suggestion would be to just eliminate the source of it by banishing the term 'virus' completely. It is redundant. When an exosome is the structure that virologists are observing, they are giving it this secondary name (virus) and attaching to that name all sorts of evil capabilities and intents that are simply not there.  While we are at it we should also eliminate the entire field of virology since it refers to a profession of researchers who are examining exosomes.

When a group of cells come into contact with exosomes they did not create they are seen as unrecognized foreign bodies and the cells that encounter them enter a state of alarm, due to a hostile environment within the body. They will then initiate functions to eliminate toxins and broken DNA strands, in an attempt to survive. This secretion is called exosome.

Just as a sidebar, I also think this process is understood by those involved in gain of function research though it may be discussed in terms used by virologists. Adenoviral shells are structures that have been used for years by vaccine manufacturers as empty mailbags, because they are covered with spikes that function like a set of keys, even a master key, and they unlock doors that allow them to deposit material inside cells they come into contact with. Synthetic versions of these structures can now be created and they can even be engineered to target only specific kinds of cells. So this means the presence of a synthetic exosome can trigger the production of additional exosomes, and this seems to be the process by which mRNA vaccines get a cell to express whatever proteins they are coded to create.

But normally, all the natural exosomes that are produced, as a response, are not the same as the one causing the alarm in the first place.

Therefore, exosomes are a method of communication between cells and a toxin elimination system and nothing more, so if you inject synthetic ones into the body, as is the case with a vaccine product, the only thing that can happen is the body will respond by creating additional exosomes to eliminate the ones it does not recognize.   And as a bonus here -- You now know what an antibody is as well.

This exosome production is observed with the same set of misunderstandings and polluted definitional terms that have been used for decades and such production is counted as antibodies. So these capsules with messages (exosome/virus/antibody) will be observed if cells decide their production as appropriate and necessary, since many times this secretion will kill the cell.

So what we have going on here is the entire process being observed is totally misunderstood and mistakenly assumed to be an invasion of pathogens that are killing cells that make up bodily tissue and the destruction of

tissue infers their presence is destroying the body and represents a contagious infection.

You can never create a vaccine against an exosome. Because it is a trigger of an already latent condition within each cell and that is programmed at the DNA level. In other words, a vaccine does not cause an immune reaction to anything other than the general presence of an unrecognized foreign body.

To block an exosome you need to manufacture a reactive biological substance against its sensors or spikes, neutralizing them. But this cannot be done without harming the rest of the host organism, since the exosome is made from the host itself. In simple explanatory terms so that it is understood -- You cannot block the key receptors for any exosome, which exist on the cell membrane, without also damaging the cell on which they exist.

Exosomes will enter the bloodstream and cause a protective alarm reaction in other cells as long as they have or are in a similar condition to the one that excreted the exosome. That similarity of condition I am referring to here is the latent ability to secrete the exact same exosome if triggered to do so by that same alarm.

Ultimately these exosomes will be excreted (shed), and if they are in sufficient quantity will go out into the environment outside the individual through respiration and other body fluids. They will float in the air and can potentially end up entering through the mucous membranes of another individual.

IT IS AT THIS POINT THAT THE PROCESS EITHER CONTINUES OR STOPS:

If a second individual has the same latent complications as the sender of the exosome then it will start an alarm reaction in their body, which is being mistakenly interpreted as the start of a disease. If the recipient individual of an excreted exosome is not compatible, the exosome will have no effect on him.

I realize how precise I am getting with such intricate descriptions of each part of the process but this is very important to do, because it is from this level of scrutiny that small misunderstandings lead to disastrously magnified and dangerous conclusions, and the myth of "viral contagion" is one example of this.

If your understanding of this process lacks precision you can see how this leads to assumptions like "viruses spread between people who all become ill, but some people, for whatever reason, do not catch it while others do."

This error can snowball from there, creating another questionable field of study which is epidemiology, the practitioners of which simply count occurrences and correlate what is frequently completely irrelevant simultaneous occurrences of almost anything else which then leads to the next mistake, which is to infer a relationship exists.

In some cases there may be one, but in other cases there is no relationship and epidemiologists never offer proof if they are so bold as to suggest such relationships exist which, by the way, is not and never has been their job.

Just to drive this point home, consider a radiation leak at a nuclear power plant. Nobody will argue the fact that nuclear radiation is deadly today, but we did not always know radiation was dangerous. An epidemiologist might look at such a situation and see cases of radiation sickness in the immediate vicinity of the power plant and amongst those who have physically been there or had contact with people who have been there, and with just that evidence, conclude radiation sickness must be caused by a contagious virus. All they do is count and make statistical models. Epidemiologists are not qualified to do anything else and should not draw any conclusions about any of the models they create.

What tends to happen however, is unsupported assumptions are almost always added later by somebody, and the need for proof they are evidence of an actual causal relationship is overlooked. The sad fact is inappropriate decisions are frequently made as to how to deal with what can appear to be, through the lens of an untrained eye, an outbreak of pathogen, but in every case you examine this essential proof is missing. The lack of it is only glaring if you are very nitpicky with describing exactly what process is going on. If you are not, it appears like germ theory has merit. It does not. This clarification, of the processes assumed by germ theory, proves it is not.

As individuals of the same group have contact with each other, many times, most of them, share the same problems, and the same environment, habitat, etc…   This makes them prone to have the same latent health problems and environmental toxicity that causes somatic toxicity (inside their bodies), causing them to be lock-key compatible with the exosomes of other members of their same group. It is here that we get ideas like herd immunity and the like.

But if a person is from another group, they may or may not have exosome reactivity. This happens more often than not. That is to say, because they come from outside they do not share the same latency, therefore they do not react to shared exosomes in the same way.

Sometimes it happens that an individual from outside arrives with foreign exosomes to an isolated community, and as this community has not had the latent pathology for a long time but it is already contained within the genetic code of the human being, or any other species, In such cases it will trigger a violent response to the presence of an exosome of the person coming from outside. As happened with the arrival of the Spaniards in the New World, among other similar scenarios.

So, when we see this happen this means that the problem, disease or medical condition, is already contained within the genetic code of a particular population. Because that is what exosomes contain, partial genetic code competent to the damage or health problem that hosts or damages the cell that has emitted it, because
the exosome is already inside the cell, it does not carry anything new, it only causes a cellular reaction according to the genetic DNA code that the exosome contains.

This leads us to the fact that a 'virus' does not mutate, (remember we are banishing the term' virus' in favor of exosome, because we know what exosomes are capable of and what they are not capable of, whereas the term 'virus' refers to a pathogen with all kinds of assumed capabilities)

Exosomes DO NOT create new variants to adapt to an environment.

What happens is that each compatible individual will produce its own exosomes as a response to the stimulus of other exosomes that have reached it from other compatible individuals around it, thus creating his/her own variant. That is to say, strictly speaking, there is one exosome variant for each person that has emitted it.

And I am talking about exosomes that carry the same genetic code activator of one or another medical conditions already inherent within individuals. For example smallpox, the onset of which is always preceded by prolonged exposure to conditions of squalor.

The process described above makes it even more impossible to create a vaccine, since the isolated exosome that causes a pathology varies and mutates with each person it touches.

The creation of supposed vaccines against SARS-CoV2 indicates that they are not vaccines at all, but the excuse of a non-existent viral disease is being used to force an inoculation of the entire human population with other substances in order to perpetuate dark and malevolent agendas.

With this explanation, anyone with a little intelligence, and little or no medical knowledge, should now be able to see that the components evidently within the inoculations "against" SARS-CoV2 simply have nothing to do with the creation of antibodies against viruses/exosomes.

Specifically, about the group of "viruses" called SARS, that contain SARS-CoV2, aka covid-19; they are essentially respiratory pulmonary. They are flu exosomes. This means that they have a very high range of variants and of effects and symptoms, and they obey the same pattern of behaviors coinciding with exosomes of chronic stress activation.

Now, lets look at the term "mutation". Because the story here we are being given is "covid is a virus that mutates". Lets not forget anything we have learned thus far and just continue the education:

An exosome does not mutate by itself, it's not something that has an agenda or that changes, like a staphylococcus bacteria would. The 'virus' is just an exosome that is secreted by people's cells when certain conditions occur and the same exosomes can be excreted into that persons immediate enviornment. So an exosome doesn't mutate, it just is.

But each different person whose cells respond to the stimulus of another person's exosomes will create slightly different exosomes or viruses. Because it comes from another person, not the original one. So the original exosome has not mutated. It is mutated by each person as they mutate their cells.

It's like making paper airplanes. You make one, I make another, some guy named Fred will make another. It's not that the airplane mutates because you can see differences between them, but rather they are slightly different because they were made by different people. And they all started making paper airplanes because they got the same idea. It is the same with exosomes.

The mutation process observed in bacteria is not the same, this natural proliferation of additional slightly customized additional exosomes are not a mutation from the point of view of what defines a biological mutation.

A staphylococcus does mutate. It changes its form as a response to the environment in which it lives, resulting in differences or changes (mutations) in its descendants as a method of adaptation to its environment. An exosome lacks this ability, it is only a stimulus that if the conditions are right, will cause another person to make its own specific and particular version of the first exosome alarm stimulus it received in the beginning.

Another analogy that might make sense is a line up of people passing a verbal message down the line. You compose a paragraph and relay the message verbally, the next person repeats it and so on. By the end of the line the message will have been received and repeated so many times with each person paraphrasing a bit that what is finally received by the last person in the line will have changed a bit from its original form, but overall its likely to be the same general message. The original message has not mutated. It was mutated by the people as the message was passed on.

The same thing occurs with exosomes.

I am not a doctor, virologist, microbiologist, scientist, etc. Many will use this against me. My formal educational background is in business but my lifelong pursuit to expand my knowledge in countless other areas that interest me has resulted in an extra ordinary ability that I possess and frequently put to use. Put bluntly, I can find the bullshit in anything and there is so much bullshit in medicine that is being put forward as evidence for pandemics and vaccines that the world is literally DROWNING in it. What I present here may sound erudite to some, and who knows, maybe it is, but to me it is simple logic. It doesn’t require that anyone have any specialized knowledge of the field. It just helps when you have to confront people that do.

I hope this information is helpful to you in finding the BS in all the propaganda
you are forced to deal with.

1 Comment

Reiner Fuellmich Files His Case With The International Criminal Court

1/22/2022

5 Comments

The following story is a reprint of an article published by Dr. Mercola. His articles vanish by design after 48 hours and are transferred to a special subscription-based substack he created, so because the link below will work only through tomorrow, I have included the text from it below:
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2022/01/22/genocide.aspx

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

Seven applicants, on behalf of the British population, have filed a complaint with the International Criminal Court (ICC), accusing 16 individuals of genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and crimes of aggression
The 16 defendants include Dr. Anthony Fauci, Dr. Peter Daszak, Bill and Melinda Gates, the CEOs of Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson, U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson along with several other British authorities, as well as the presidents of the Rockefeller Foundation and the World Economic Forum
According to the ICC complaint, the 16 defendants have violated the Nuremberg Code and Articles 6, 7, 8, 15, 21 and 53 of the Rome Statute
The Nuremberg Code is a set of medical research ethics principles that grew out of the “Doctors Trial” in Nuremberg following World War II. The war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg established 10 standards to which doctors must conform when performing experiments on human subjects
The ICC is a permanent, independent court that investigates crimes that concern the international community. Its activities are governed by an international treaty called the Rome Statute, which has been ratified by more than 120 countries, including the U.S. It can step in when a member state fails to take appropriate action to bring a criminal to justice. In theory, member states are supposed to cooperate with the court

According to The Desert Review, a slew of high-power figures in the COVID-19 pandemic and the push to mandate experimental COVID jabs have been accused of several crimes, including crimes against humanity, war crimes and crimes of aggression in the U.K.

“In a stunning 46-page legal filing to the International Criminal Court on December 6 [2021], an intrepid attorney and seven applicants accused Anthony Fauci, Peter Daszak, Melinda Gates, William Gates III, and twelve others of numerous violations of the Nuremberg Code. These included various crimes against humanity and war crimes as defined by the Rome Statutes, Articles 6, 7, 8, 15, 21, and 53.”

The Dirty 16
In all, the 16 defendants named in the legal filing are:

Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the NIAID
Dr. Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance
Bill Gates
Melinda Gates
Albert Bourla, CEO of Pfizer
Stephane Bancel, CEO of Moderna
Pascal Soriot, CEO of AstraZeneca
Alex Gorsky, CEO of Johnson & Johnson
Tedros Adhanhom Ghebreyesus, director-general of the WHO
Boris Johnson, U.K. prime minister
Christopher Whitty, U.K. chief medical adviser
Matthew Hancock, former U.K. secretary of state for Health and Social Care
Medicines and Healthcare, current U.K. secretary of state for Health and Social Care
June Raine, U.K. chief executive of Medicines and Healthcare products
Dr. Rajiv Shah, president of the Rockefeller Foundation
Klaus Schwab, president of the World Economic Forum

The victims, on behalf of whom the complaint was filed, are “the peoples of the United Kingdom.” One of the seven applicants is Dr. Michael Yeadon, a former vice president and chief scientist of allergy and respiratory research at Pfizer.

At the end of 2020, he expressed deep concerns about the COVID jabs becoming mandatory, as he could find no medical rationale for their use. In 2021, as we all know, mandates were rolled out around the world. In April 2021, Yeadon went public with concerns that the shots were part of a depopulation agenda.

“I believe [COVID-19 booster shots] are going to be used to damage your health and possibly kill you. I can see no sensible interpretation other than a serious attempt at mass depopulation,” he said in a “Planet Lockdown” interview published in late April 2021.

What Is the International Criminal Court?
The International Criminal Court (ICC) is an intergovernmental organization and international tribunal located in The Hague, Netherlands. Its activities are governed by an international treaty called the Rome Statute, which has been ratified by more than 120 countries, including the U.S.

The ICC is a permanent, independent court that investigates crimes that concern the international community, such as claims of genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and crimes of aggression. In theory, member states are supposed to cooperate with the court, but that doesn’t always happen.

If warranted, the court can prosecute and try individuals charged with these types of crimes, but it will typically only do so if the member state fails to take the appropriate legal actions against the perpetrator, which can happen if a government tries to shield the individual in question from criminal responsibility.

As noted in the complaint:

“We have tried to raise this case through the local English police and the English Court system without success, we have been unable to even get the case registered either with the police or with the court after several attempts.

The statute for the ICC declares that ‘The ICC is intended to complement, not to replace, national criminal systems; it prosecutes cases only when a State is unwilling or unable genuinely to carry out the investigation or prosecution. This is such a case which is why we are addressing the ICC directly.”

Still, the ICC relies on the states’ national law enforcement to arrest individuals, so a member state can still restrict the court’s ability to bring a criminal to justice. The ICC does not have its own police force to carry out warrants or arrests. In this case, defendants are scattered across several countries. According to the ICC complaint, the 16 defendants have violated the Nuremberg Code and four articles of the Rome Statute.

Violation 1 — The Nuremberg Code
The Nuremberg Code is a set of medical research ethics principles that grew out of the “Doctors Trial” in Nuremberg following World War II. The war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg established 10 standards to which doctors must conform when performing experiments on human subjects.

Foremost among these codes of ethics is the necessity of informed consent to participate in medical experimentation. The Nuremberg Code has also been the basis for other medical ethics guidance and laws, including the Helsinki Declaration of 1965, which binds practicing physicians to “act in the patient’s best interest when providing medical care.”

While not a binding law, the complaint argues that the Nuremberg Code qualifies as a source of international law by way of Article 21(1)(b) of the Rome Statute, which recognizes international law, international treaties, international custom and principles of law recognized by civilized nations as being of equal value.

Violation 2 — Genocide
Article 6 of the Rome Statute refers to acts of genocide, i.e., acts intended to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group. Here, the group in question is the British population in its entirety, and by extension the world, starting with the elderly, chronically ill and disabled. Genocide can include the acts of:

Killing
Causing serious bodily or mental harm
Imposing measures intended to reduce fertility
Deliberately inflicting conditions of life, calculated to bring about whole or partial destruction
All of these definitions apply in this case, and details are provided to support each charge. For example, with regard to “conditions of life calculated to bring about destruction,” this includes both the destruction of businesses and transfer of wealth through imposed lockdowns, and damaging people’s immune systems through the refusal to offer early treatment, mask mandates and coercing people to take the COVID jab.

Violation 3 — Crimes Against Humanity
Article 7 of the Rome Statute covers crimes against humanity, which includes:

Murder
-Imprisonment or severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law
-Torture
-Enforced sterilizations
-Apartheid and other inhumane acts

Extermination
-Persecution of any identifiable group

The specific charges under each are detailed in the complaint, with data to support them.

Violation 4 — War Crimes
War crimes are covered in Article 8 of the Rome Statute. The complaint argues that “a covert war has been waged against the people of the United Kingdom (and the world) through the release of the biological weapon SARS-Cov-2 and the additional bioweapon, m-RNA gene therapy ‘vaccines.” They also include a charge of Mens Rea, meaning the intent to commit a crime, stating that:

“... the members of the UK government and world international leaders against which we have brought this complaint, are knowingly working on behalf of this global agenda for depopulation through the biological weapons known as SARS-Cov-2 and the m-RNA ‘vaccines.’

We submit therefore that the members of the UK government and world leaders against which we have brought this complaint have both knowledge and intent with respect to these alleged crimes.”

War crimes listed in the complaint include:
-Willful killing by way of the experimental COVID jabs, the use of lethal doses of midazolam in nursing home patients diagnosed with COVID, and the inclusion of graphene hydroxide in the shots.

Not only are they asking for a full investigation into the inclusion of graphene hydroxide in some of the COVID shots, they also want a full investigation into the suspected assassination of Dr. Andreas Noack, a German chemist and a top graphene expert. Noack’s doctoral thesis described the conversion of graphene oxide into graphene hydroxide. According to the complaint:

Professor Dr. Pablo Campra comes from the university of Almeria, and alongside Dr. Andreas Noack he examined the covid ‘vaccines’ for the presence of graphene oxide with the Micro-Raman Spectroscopy, the study of frequencies. According to both doctors, the vaccines don’t contain graphene oxide but do contain graphene hydroxide.

A note from John Lukach, author of this blog:

*I want to add here some information I will publish here soon and also provide to Reiner Fuellmich's legal committee, that removes the controversy over whether or not covid vaccines contain graphene oxide. Dr. Noack is only partially correct here. Graphene oxide is in fact in the shots and that has been confirmed multiple times by independent researchers including Dr. Robert Young. What has not been found in any of the vials examined is graphene hydroxide in a pure form, but this is not necessary as you will see. Based on my research into the nano-technology that enables drug production and delivery in vivo via remote frequency transmission and advanced manufacturing methods utilizing pulsed EMF to enable the self assembly of dozens of graphene-based nano-particulate substances using only a base of graphene oxide and the presence of combinatory heavy metals, 13 of which Dr. Robert Young has positively identified in various covid vaccine brands by use of advanced spectrographic analysis, it is absolutely possible that graphene hydroxide can be spontaneously generated in vivo, and because all the covid vaccines contain graphene oxide they all install a kind of latent "kill-switch" that can be remotely triggered by exposure to specific EMF frequencies. Please see related research here:
https://patents.google.com/patent/US8747623B2/en?q=microwave+assisted+graphene+synthesis+reactions&oq=microwave+assisted+graphene+synthesis+reactions
This is the real "5G connection".

Other research I have discovered recently expose the delivery method to be injectable micro-bubbles (aka microfluidic biochips) that have the ability to enter a cell by passing through the cell wall. Their behavior is suspiciously similar to that of a virus, which I have repeatedly proven does not exist naturally, but it seems, can be created artificially. These microscopic poly-vinyl bubbles have been observed in samples taken from covid vaccine vials under a normal optical microscope by Dr. Zandre Botha but she did not know what they were at the time she saw them, in fact, nobody who has seen these structures has yet been able to identify them, but I now know what they are.

Please refer to this video analysis created by InfoVacunas for an explanation of the process:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/HHybNCTeHMY9/

These polyvinyl micro bubble structures can be remotely directed to accumulate in specific tissues and later caused to expand and burst via EMF radiation exposure, releasing their contents either inside a cell or while still in the bodies vasculature.

Additionally, the total amount of mass of graphene oxide in particular can be made to spontaneously multiply as much as 30 times by exposing it to pulse modulated EMF in ranges as low as 1 to 2.47Ghz which are currently in use in most all smart devices. The production of graphene based compounds like graphene hydroxide, and others, can not only be produced in the bodies of vaccinated populations but their presence is able to produce the symptomology of a number of destructive diseases, among which is Marburg, a rare and almost always fatal disease that kills by causing severe hemorrhagic fevers. These are runaway inflammations characterized by internal bleeding that occur in multiple organs all at once. If you recall an earlier piece I did on what has been referred to as MIS or multi-system inflammatory syndrome, this is a similar observation being made adverse event reports seen in vaccinated children, where they die due to the unexplained onset of pericarditis, leading to terminal sepsis as the cause of death.

Marburg in particular is a disease that is so rare you almost never hear of it, but it has received unusual press recently from the CDC and WHO, who have published strange warnings of the possibility of a Marburg epidemic, which makes sense if you consider that this is a disease that can be created in the body of a vaccinated person if the vaccines they received contain both graphene oxide and the right combinatory heavy metals. If graphene oxide can be chemically changed into graphene hydroxide it would react with the body as Dr. Noack describes and victims would die from massive internal bleeding (hemorrhagic fever) since, as Dr. Noack explained before he was murdered, "the presence of graphene hydroxide is like introducing millions of nano razor blades in the blood stream".

Graphene oxide IS in the jabs, of that there is no longer any question, and this has even been confirmed by Karen Kingston, who has even provided the patent that identifies graphene oxide as a "trade secret" undisclosed ingredient in each of the covid vaccines and the company that produces the material, specifically for use by Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZenica, and Johnson and Johnson.

It was on the MSDS site that she saw that the company Sinopeg was the company manufacturing these Pegylated lipids for the Covid Vaccines. On the Sinopeg website they list these lipids under the auspices of “Covid-19 Excipients” they also have articles on their website talking about how they do work with graphene oxide. (other companies do the same thing as they are all part of the Graphene Flagship-a Billion Euro project put together by the EU that funds Graphene Oxide research)

--------

The article continues:

On November 23, 2021, Dr. Andreas Noack released a video explaining what graphene hydroxide is and how the nano structures injected into the human body act as ‘razor blades’ inside the veins of ‘vaccine’ recipients ...

On 18th November 2020 Dr. Andreas Noack was on a ‘livestream’ on YouTube discussing the dangers of the Covid-19 ‘vaccines’ when he was arrested on camera by armed German police. On 26th November 2021, just hours after publishing his latest video about graphene oxide and graphene hydroxide he was attacked and murdered.

We request a full investigation be done into the inclusion of Graphene hydroxide in the Covid-19 ‘vaccines’ and into the assassination of Dr. Andreas Noack.”

Torture by way of forced mask wearing, the use of test swabs containing carcinogenic chemicals, and the release of a manmade bioweapon.

Willfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health — Examples include the forced use of masks, the closing of doctors’ offices, the COVID jab mandates, the use of psychological warfare, the use of economic warfare, the use of biological warfare, denial of effective medicines, suppression of alternative treatments, use of ventilators despite evidence of harm, and euthanizing elderly COVID patients with midazolam.

Extensive destruction and appropriation of property, not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly.

Intentionally directing attacks against civilians, including those not taking direct part in any hostilities.

Intentionally launching an attack, knowing it will cause loss of life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, and/or widespread, long-term and severe damage to the natural environment.

Violation 5 — Crimes of Aggression
The last violation is crimes of aggression against the British population, covered under Article 8 bis3 of the Rome Statute. According to the complaint:

“This is a global criminal conspiracy, which has been planned for several decades. It is now obvious that ‘the plan’ involves the ultrarich and leaders of most nation states, with a few exceptions."

It is also clear that powerful think-tanks including WEF [World Economic Forum] in Davos as well as the Club of Rome, and other NGOs like WHO and GAVI among others, are at the centre of this draconian criminal conspiracy. Under the official slogan; ‘BUILD BACK BETTER,’ used by the President of WHO, the President of USA, as well as the President of WEF, the Prime Minister of the UK as well as countless other world leaders.

The goal of this activity is to create a new world order, through the UN ‘s Agenda 2030, by dismantling all the Democratic Nation States, step by step, controlled by an un-elected elite and to destroy the freedoms and basic human rights of the peoples of the Earth.

In addition to this, the aim is to destroy small and medium sized businesses, moving the market shares to the largest corporations, owned by the Global Elite. The fulfillment of this goal will most likely lead to full enslavement of mankind.

This is being done by means of the threat from both a dangerous biological weapon, the virus, the vaccines, the testing test pins, the mask mandates and all other measures. All of which constitute not only a breach of National laws, but also a fundamental breach of the Charter of the United Nations and the Treaty of Rome and our Fundamental Human rights.

It is of the utmost urgency that ICC take immediate action, taking all of this into account, to stop the rollout of COVID vaccinations, introduction of unlawful vaccination passports and all other types of illegal warfare mentioned herein currently being waged against the people of the United Kingdom by way of a court injunction.”

New Findings Will ‘Dismantle the Entire Vaccine Industry’
In a January 1, 2022, video announcement Dr. Reiner Fuellmich — a U.S.-German consumer protection trial lawyer and cofounder of the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee (Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss) launched July 10, 2020 — announced the data they now have in their possession is “enough to dismantle the entire vaccine industry.”

Fuellmich is heading up the committee’s corona crisis tort case. Initially, the committee focused on exposing the PCR test fraud, but now they also have evidence that the vaccine makers were using different lot numbers to carry out an experiment within an experiment, unbeknownst to the public.

According to Fuellmich, it looks like an experiment to determine the dosage needed to kill and/or maim people. In other words, people have not been getting identical products. Different lots or batches contain different dosages and even different ingredients.

There is inescapable evidence, in my view as a lawyer, of there being premeditation. ~ Dr. Reiner Fuellmich

According to Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, former chair of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe Health Committee, they have “hard evidence” of this. He points to an investigation published in late 2021 showing only 5% of the lots were responsible for 100% of the rapid deaths.

In the video, Wodarg also shows a graph of 9,500 different Pfizer jab batches, with some having a toxicity, as evidenced by deaths, that is 3,000 times above the baseline. Others have a toxicity that is 2,500 times higher than baseline. Between them are batches with no deaths attributed to them.

Wodarg also claims to have data showing that the vaccine makers appear to have coordinated and synchronized their experimentation, so that only one of them is releasing a potentially deadly batch at a time. But they’re all doing this. They’re all experimenting with dosages and ingredients, Wodarg insists, and the reason they’re able to do this is because there are no review boards overseeing any of them.

“There is inescapable evidence, in my view as a lawyer, of there being premeditation,” Fuellmich says. And if premeditation can be proven, then there is no legal immunity for anyone anymore. They can all be held liable for injuries and deaths.

Without doubt, the legal battles will be incredibly difficult to pursue, as there are so many powerful people working together on this, protecting each other. But that doesn’t mean we don’t try. On the contrary, we must do everything in our power to bring the criminals behind this global takeover to justice, and hold them accountable for everything that has been done to our economies, our livelihoods, our families, our health and our children’s futures.

Had Enough Yet?

5 Comments

Supreme Court Rules: Take This Mandate And SHOVE IT!

1/14/2022

2 Comments

I apologize for not writing more articles so far this month. January has just felt like a slow news month to me thus far, and I have been working on getting my books back in print and doing a series of interviews on them with the creator of www.fakologist.com . He does a live internet radio call in show Monday through Thursday at 8pm EST that you can listen to or participate in by following this link https://fakeologist.com/live at the appointed time:.

I cover a lot of important stuff in these chats, and aside from some glitches getting on the air with him in the beginning of these sessions, they are really pretty good recordings. I suggest just fast forwarding past that. I have already done six hours of material with him and we have more planned, so if you would like to hear any of it you can find the audio recordings here: https://fakeologist.com/audio/live/

So I have been active, just a bit less so on the blog page. Not much to new to bring up that I have not already covered, but this is one development that I think many of you out there have been praying for:

SUPREME COURT BLOCKS FEDERAL MANDATE FOR PRIVATE WORKERS TO VACCINATE OR TEST
https://vaccineimpact.com/2022/supreme-court-blocks-osha-vaccine-mandate-upholds-cms-healthcare-workers-vaccine-mandate/

The justices dropped two rulings late Thursday: one that freezes the mandate for large businesses and another that green-lights enforcement against health care workers. The rulings take effect immediately and will remain in place until legal challenges over their constitutionality are resolved through the justice system, and possibly through the Supreme Court.

As this decision drew near I decided I'd watch some of the coverage of arguments being presented on C-Span. That’s lasted 10 minutes for me. I sat there utterly speechless at the level of complete ignorance on full display as a few of the Justices asked questions. It was as if none of them had ever heard about this thing going on outside called the pandemic. Now, maybe this is an unfair criticism since basic questions I sort of expected, but what they were asking -- I almost expected to hear one of them ask what covid-19 was. And the attorneys making the arguments? Even harder to watch. 100% apocalyptic disaster on Earth, dead bodies everywhere, oh the humanity… I vaguely heard Jerry Seinfeld in the background uttering his famous question; "Who are these people?" They laid the bullshit on so thick I found myself looking for a barf bag and I turned it off.

The elephant in the room remains. Nobody thought it important, from what I could see, to spend anytime proving there actually were all these people in all these workplaces clearly dying from covid due unvaxxed workers killing them, and they pleaded for the court not to take even a short recess to collect some facts with which to make a good decision, as if every minute of delay made each of them murderers, nor did anyone need to see any evidence there were any. I suppose if they had the whole scam would be toast.

Still, despite the half measure approach to this, which settled very little about the credibility of this entire thing, I suppose what this means in a practical sense is all of you people with jobs outside of federally funded healthcare systems are off the hook for now. That doesn't mean your employers will necessarily stop pestering you to commit suicide or ruin your ruin health permanently with covid shots, but at least now you have a decent defense, and grounds they should respect for abstaining from the cult of covid.

“It's not truly intended to regulate a workplace danger; it's a danger that we all face simply as a matter of waking up in the morning,” Flowers argued.

I think the fact nobody seems to be picking up on the implications of this statement speaks volumes to the level of theatrical planning that quite likely went on behind the scenes as this disappointing script was war gamed out in advance. This is a Freudian slip if I ever heard one. And its exactly the argument I would want to hear people involved at this level making. Because really, I want to see them act like adults rather than submissive prisoners of their own fears. Probably too much to hope for, but she did say that, and now its out there for you to start repeating.

I do feel bad for the healthcare workers. Those people need to find other careers I guess, because very few of these attempts to find an objection their employers will allow them to use are going to work. For those that stay and find themselves in this position, I suggest calling their bluff as a last option. There is a shortage of healthcare workers. When the last of you healthy ones go that’s it for whatever system you left behind. Those who remain will be sickly, unreliable workers and their numbers will noticeably shrink until the system barely functions, which I think has been the object of the drill here from the start. If you want to advance a depopulation program destroying the healthcare system is arguably a valid tactical strategy.

True to form, the Biden puppet lost no time coming out as if nothing happened, telling Americans to do it anyway. Don't be surprised. It is what we have come to expect from this presidential ventriloquist dummy.

Also of note is one upcoming deadline tomorrow that may mean the debut of yet another "scarient" to keep the fires of fear burning brightly.

The EUA expires on Jan 15 and they need an “emergency” to keep the EUA in place. So Omicron has to be a MAJOR threat to society, otherwise the EUA's could potentially go away.

I wouldn't get too excited though. Here's what I predict. Tomorrow is a Saturday. Nobody's looking. Maybe they just quietly extend this thing without offering any real cause other than "people are dying" and like we have seen in the past, this announcement will come out like a whisper by someone you never heard of sometime next week in a place you also don't look. After all… the show must go on, right?

"Off-Broadway Covid."

Here's some more of that show:

DR. JANE RUBY - DEADLY VAX BATCHES IDENTIFIED, STILL IN CIRCULATION
https://ugetube.com/watch/dr-jane-ruby-deadly-vax-batches-identified-still-in-circulation-stew-peters-show_QPmc3avF47p1LNS.html
Why take them out when they are "working" so well?

HOW BAD IS MY BATCH
https://howbad.info/
Just enter your lot number BEFORE you seriously regret it later. How much time does that take? And if you do find a provider handing out one of these hot lots email me with who they are if you are not willing to do anything about it. Because you can bet I will.

BIDEN- POSSIBLE RESTRICTIONS ON UNVACCINATED FOR DOMESTIC TRAVEL
https://www.bitchute.com/video/tLSQvQQpd5T6/
Anyone rolling over for this sort of thing has no business calling themselves Americans. Just my opinion. C'mon, where's your spine? I know I don't live in a nation of jellyfish.

Then again…

AIRLINE PILOT MAGAZINE SHOWS A STAGGERING AMOUNT OF PILOT DEATHS FOR 2021
https://www.bitchute.com/video/MY4jDRFd5jly/?list=subscriptions

ONE HUNDRED AND ELEVEN VAXXED PILOTS... DEAD IN JUST NINE MONTHS!

Are you sure you want to get on a plane these days? You won't catch me doing it unless I am flying it.

THE POWER OF WORDS
https://www.bitchute.com/video/kD4n0pBfj07R/?list=subscriptions
I like Max Igan. Some may not. He's kind of like a wise grandpa type, but even if you don't, there is a lot he shows you in this clip Not sure what to say about this except the first ten minutes has some of the craziest abuses of "science" I have ever heard of. You can make up your own mind about all of that, but don't miss it, and if you like that, the rest of the clip is chock full of more.

COVID NURSE: "I’M THE GUY WHO EUTHANIZED THEM… I’M THE GUY WHO PUSHED THE BUTTON, LIKE IN THE GAS CHAMBERS
https://www.bitchute.com/video/YjItrMggAq5U/
Here's something you don't see every day. This is a male nurse that represents, I think, the danger of really stupid people in positions of importance. Like those who stood trial at Nuremberg, he was just doing his job. But unlike those guys, he suddenly realized his ignorance resulted in the deaths of quite a few people, which, you know, is bad, M'Kay? Maybe some of you will see this as some kind of twisted apology. Where's what came to mind for me: He is not the only moron out there making real life and death decisions. You better hope you never meet anyone like this under similar circumstances.

MANY EU NATIONS DRASTICALLY DEVIATE FROM 'BENFORD'S LAW' (SIGNS OF MASSIVE COVID FRAUD !)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/8DlHLEbbvbAn/
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2021/12/25/2021.12.24.21268373.full.pdf?fbclid=IwAR28PYUvQYJlxYUETdpmQKBIZMgm69glybkeTKy6FN72t0DbtYR_kwNWHw4
Pay attention to this one. This is how you catch a thief. As Fauci likes to say; "It's tha NUMBAS."

3 UNVAXED GIRLS THREATENED OVER VACCINATION STATUS JUMP TO THEIR DEATHS
https://www.bitchute.com/video/PIAezG7RNTXA/
Very sad. Is this what its come to?

CHINA HAS AMAZING RESPONSE TO COLLAPSING PEOPLE
https://www.bitchute.com/video/5SlQiFHLmj25/
I can't imagine what it must be like living in a country where something like this is just normal. Can you?

WHAT HAPPENS IF YOU ARE THE LEADER OF A COUNTRY AND DON'T PLAY THE VACCINE GAME?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/WNAz4IA0gKLu/?list=subscriptions

THE DOUBLE-VACCINATED ARE A THREAT TO THE TRIPLE-VACCINATED…
https://truthinplainsight.com/the-double-vaccinated-are-a-threat-to-the-triple-vaccinated/
HA! Good Grief. This is denial taken to a whole new level. What are ya? STOOOPID?!?

FARMERS, TRUCKERS STOPPED AS MAINSTREAM FOOD SUPPLY COLLAPSES
https://www.bitchute.com/video/VuXWUgSIe3tw/

Ice Age Farmer is a decent information source, and what this fellow chooses to talk about is fairly unique too. For those of you wondering if the food shortages we keep hearing about are going to suddenly be everywhere, I don't really see much to suggest its too far off now. Yesterday my grocery store had no milk. In the past month I have seen more and more holes on the shelves and I frequently have to choose substitute brands now for items I buy routinely. Its just a matter of time. Ice Age Farmer warned of this last year when he explained the position farmers were being put in financially which basically gave them significantly higher profits to destroy crops rather than sell them and this is one way covid helicopter money is being spent. Meanwhile, existing food reserves dwindle, fake covid discoveries and covid case counts in meat packing plants result in closures and still more food destruction. Who is going to fill those shelves folks? Here he talks about trucking across the Canadian border, or really, the lack of it. I'd say the impact of what he reveals to be going on is being felt, now, and by me.

How about you? Are you seeing more empty store shelves than you are used to wherever you are?

I will close this post out with an encouraging little montage of rebellion, both at home and around the world. There are growing numbers out there who have HAD ENOUGH!

You Are Not Alone.

FDA/CDC WHISTLEBLOWER WANTED: NAME YOUR PRICE
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/fdacdc-whistleblower-wanted-name
Wow. Now THAT is putting your money (LOTS OF IT) where your mouth is.

AUSTRALIA GOVT TASTES ITS OWN DESTRUCTION: ABORIGINALS BURN PARLIAMENT OVER FORCED DRUGGING & CAMPS
https://www.bitchute.com/video/TMLPViKSqAcZ/?list=subscriptions

BUNCH OF GOOD OLD BOYS IN BRAZIL. NOT TAKING IN ON ANY PART OF THE GLOBALISTS GAMES
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Jr8ZF7enAmvD/

THIS IS GOING TO HAPPEN EVERYWHERE. FIGHT FOR YOUR FREEDOMS.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/D1ezCpPscIW1/

UKRAINIANS DEMONSTRATING HOW TO DEAL WITH POLICE TYRANNY
https://www.bitchute.com/video/frmW0zozWAzy/

'HEAVILY ARMED' CALIFORNIA MAN ARRESTED IN IOWA; PLANNED TO KILL BIDEN, FAUCI AND OTHERS
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/heavily-armed-california-man-arrested-iowa-way-kill-biden-fauci-and-others
Maybe I am going a bit far out on a limb here, but I tend to think this guy was triggered by a lot more than just his "mommy didn't love him." Secretly… I kind of wish he had been a little smarter about his plan.

I'm with YOU, Brother.

BROTHER ALEXIS BUGNOLO: "ARREST THE CRIMINALS"
https://www.bitchute.com/video/CKjqWFuisjlm/
(Friar Tuck Lives Again.)

When Do We Start?

2 Comments

Ivermectin disables HIVgp120!

1/7/2022

1 Comment

THE IVERMECTIN STORY - WHAT IS IVERMECTIN?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLxJUOc_p5o
(Send this to Ivermectin naysayers)

SO WHY THE OPEN WAR ON IVERMECTIN?

HOSPITAL TRIES TO MEDICALLY KIDNAP CHILDREN GIVEN IVERMECTIN BY PARENTS
https://vaccineimpact.com/2021/hospital-tries-to-medically-kidnap-children-given-ivermectin-by-parents/

A very disturbing video from a woman in New Hampshire has emerged where she recorded hospital personnel and child social service agents trying to hunt down a father who reported he was giving his children Ivermectin. Add to this the medical mafia and their cartel just won’t allow any competition for their bioweapon COVID-19 shots, and they will do everything they can to try and destroy you and your family, including kidnapping your children, to make you comply. Attorney Aaron Siri, a Vaccine Injury attorney who is currently suing the FDA, has reported that the FDA is now seizing orders of Ivermectin coming into the U.S. (Source.)

US POSTAL SERVICE IS STEALING & DESTROYING IVERMECTIN SHIPMENTS
DOCUMENT REPORTEDLY REVEALS FDA COLLUDED WITH USPS TO BLOCK DELIVERY OF IVERMECTIN
https://100percentfedup.com/breaking-document-reportedly-reveals-fda-colluded-with-usps-to-block-delivery-of-ivermectin/

THIS IS PARTIALLY THE REASON WHY:

STEW PETERS & DR. JANE RUBY | MOVING ORGANISMS IN VIALS - DECEMBER 17, 2021
https://www.bitchute.com/video/RZBvFYSu9rUI/
Its kills this stuff.

LATEST LIVE BLOOD SAMPLES FROM THE VAXXXED
https://www.bitchute.com/video/QA1IIgLAmEYg/
And this stuff.

BUT REALLY,
THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO HAVE IT BECAUSE OF THIS:

Ivermectin is CRITICAL.

It does far more than kill parasites…

Ivermectin disables HIVgp120!

"Ivermectin inhibits the formation of the importin-α (IMPα) and IMPβ1 ... sulfate proteoglycans with the V3 region of envelope gp120-gp41"

HIV gp120 is another thing that mRNA included in the Pfizer and Moderna covid shots makes your body produce. It is a glycoprotein that causes immune system damage. Introducing this glycoprotein into your body gives you an auto immune disease. There are specific mRNA sequences in both Pfizer and Moderna covid jabs that code for HIVgp120 production. This is HIV.

This is the reason for what is being called "antibody induced enhancement". It is the tendency for covid vaccinated populations to become WEAKER over time, until after a certain amount of exposure to these poisonous "vaccine" formulations they have no viable immune function to speak of any longer. This is the condition which makes vaccinated people highly susceptible to diseases of all kinds. This glycoprotien destroys immune function. It is why vaccinated people routinely become sick afterwards. If your body is producing this you have an auto immune disease, however Ivermectin stops this.

You Must Exit the Covid Mind Control Machine

I know you get blasted every day on a minute by minute basis with faux "helth" propaganda, we all do, but its all rubbish, every last bit of it. It is all produced and disseminated with a singular intent, and that is to pass the buck somewhere that blame does not belong. We are already seeing reports filtering out of insurance companies that are clearly showing a massive uptick in all cause mortality. The first of these came out of a multi-billion dollar insurance group in Indiana, but since there have been others. You should really take notice of this because it is a big deal.

Insurance is a business that relies upon actuarial risk tables, and that is how it has always worked. Your premiums must be such that the payouts on claims does not exceed some legal level of asset reserve in the company. If it did the company would go bust. Insurance companies always know what to charge for premiums, it is a simple math problem that is based upon rates of incidence for all kinds of things that commonly befall people. This is nothing new.

What is new, is the level of deaths being reported. These are people making insurance claims on their policies, so its not like this is conjecture here. When that number rises up over 40%, which by the way is unheard of pre-covid vaccine, that is a big problem, and a huge red flag that nobody really even has to point out as a vaccine injury problem, so don't expect many people to do that, but its the only thing that has changed. In fact, one insurance executive has said publicly that an increase in all cause mortality of just 10% would be considered a once in a 200 year type event and it might be caused by something like the tsunami that washed over Indonesia back in 2004.

What have you heard about on that order that just all of the sudden happened in December in Indiana? Any volcanoes blow up? Any earthquakes? Did a nuclear first strike just escape your notice? Not likely.

A 40% uptick has never happened before! If you feel inclined to say this is somehow a covid bug, well, you would also have to produce covid dead, and I don't mean the claims of however many covid cases are being reported. I am talking about REAL COVID DEAD, and there aren't any. In fact, you can barely find one death blamed decisively on the latest covid "scarient". My readers know well my stance on covid, that covid not a real illness but is actually just the term being used to cover up covid vaccine injury, and I can and have, supported that fact very well for over a year now.

So knowing that, what are all these people dying of? What suddenly killed somewhere in the neighborhood of 187,000 policy holding people of working age in Indiana?

You know what did.

We all know what did.

You see, what you all need to do is lose the covid filter they are pushing on you and suddenly everything makes perfect sense and you can even predictably anticipate pretty much every move the architects of this pandemic scam have planned. Once the thrill of a new covid variant gets too threadbare to peddle out again it will be some weird outbreak of a disease hardly anyone has ever heard of before, that was chosen solely for some horrific symptomology associated with it and that will be the new boogeyman.

It might also be something you think you know all about, like Polio or Smallpox, and that will suddenly be everywhere, or possibly everywhere, its simply about what scares you the most and little else. And its not really even necessary to ACTUALLY infect real people with anything really scary, since its all just movie magic and theater on the nightly news anyhow. But if people are actually dying from anything it is because they all have zero immune function after too many covid jabs, that's it. They might die ultimately for damn near any reason at all. The worst examples will be all over the TV and the rest will be called covid.

1 Comment

CORONA-HOAX
HAD ENOUGH YET?

To the reader that asked me for help for her mom who got vaxxed and now has blood clots...

Clarifying the confusion surrounding the use of terms such as 'virus' and 'exosome'

Reiner Fuellmich Files His Case With The International Criminal Court

Supreme Court Rules: Take This Mandate And SHOVE IT!

"Off-Broadway Covid."

You Are Not Alone.

I'm with YOU, Brother.

When Do We Start?

Ivermectin disables HIVgp120!

SO WHY THE OPEN WAR ON IVERMECTIN?

THIS IS PARTIALLY THE REASON WHY:

BUT REALLY,
THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO HAVE IT BECAUSE OF THIS:

You Must Exit the Covid Mind Control Machine

Author

Archives

Categories

CORONA-HOAX HAD ENOUGH YET?

To the reader that asked me for help for her mom who got vaxxed and now has blood clots...

Clarifying the confusion surrounding the use of terms such as 'virus' and 'exosome'

Reiner Fuellmich Files His Case With The International Criminal Court

Supreme Court Rules: Take This Mandate And SHOVE IT!

"Off-Broadway Covid."​

You Are Not Alone.​​

I'm with YOU, Brother.

​When Do We Start?

Ivermectin disables HIVgp120!

SO WHY THE OPEN WAR ON IVERMECTIN?​

THIS IS PARTIALLY THE REASON WHY:​

BUT REALLY, ​THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO HAVE IT BECAUSE OF THIS:

You Must Exit the Covid Mind Control Machine

Author

Archives

Categories

CORONA-HOAX
HAD ENOUGH YET?

"Off-Broadway Covid."

You Are Not Alone.

When Do We Start?

SO WHY THE OPEN WAR ON IVERMECTIN?

THIS IS PARTIALLY THE REASON WHY:

BUT REALLY,
THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO HAVE IT BECAUSE OF THIS: