This has been the number one question for those who were duped into getting covid vaccinated. Well, it seems the results over time have finally begun to give us some insight into the answer. Unfortunately, its not very encouraging news. Hats off to this substack writer who published a great synopsis of a study done by the Cleveland Clinic with analysis done by Josh Stirling.
THE LONG-TERM CONSEQUENCES OF COVID-19 VACCINATION ARE NOW BEING REALIZED…
https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/cdc-data-confirms-covid-vaccination
The latest Cleveland Clinic Data and the latest US data analyzed by Josh Stirling, founder of Insurance Collaboration to Save Lives and former #1 ranked Insurance Analyst, shows a really, really disturbing trend.
https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/cdc-data-confirms-covid-vaccination
The latest Cleveland Clinic Data and the latest US data analyzed by Josh Stirling, founder of Insurance Collaboration to Save Lives and former #1 ranked Insurance Analyst, shows a really, really disturbing trend.
The damage to health caused by each vaccine dose does not lessen over time.
It continues indefinitely.
It continues indefinitely.
So on 2022 September 12, 6,199 employees were unvaxxed, 2,359 were single jabbed, 13,804 were double jabbed, 20,798 were triple jabbed and 3,538 were quad jabbed or penta jabbed with the original vaccine, which was designed against the Wuhan Hu1 reference virus, which was NOT isolated from a Human but was generated on a computer.
The results of their study, shown graphically above, demonstrate that the more doses of the original vaccine you took, the more likely you were to catch covid. In other words, the original Covid vaccine is not merely ineffective against Omicron. It is actually anti-effective.
It is therefore not a vaccine against the present strain of Covid. It is an antivaccine. It damages your immune system in a dose-dependent manner. The more shots you took, the more damage you will have done to your immune system.
The writer first saw this from PHE Vaccine Surveillance reports and published his findings to PHE themselves AND on my website and in The Expose, on 2021 October 10.
‘The Science’ has now been established by the Cleveland Clinic. Genetic vaccines damage your immune system and make you not less likely but more likely to be infected with Covid. (Which is a very misleading statement given that covid is a fictitious illness. Get it straight -- covid is vaccine injury!)
The results of their study, shown graphically above, demonstrate that the more doses of the original vaccine you took, the more likely you were to catch covid. In other words, the original Covid vaccine is not merely ineffective against Omicron. It is actually anti-effective.
It is therefore not a vaccine against the present strain of Covid. It is an antivaccine. It damages your immune system in a dose-dependent manner. The more shots you took, the more damage you will have done to your immune system.
The writer first saw this from PHE Vaccine Surveillance reports and published his findings to PHE themselves AND on my website and in The Expose, on 2021 October 10.
‘The Science’ has now been established by the Cleveland Clinic. Genetic vaccines damage your immune system and make you not less likely but more likely to be infected with Covid. (Which is a very misleading statement given that covid is a fictitious illness. Get it straight -- covid is vaccine injury!)
Not only that, but they have horrendous side effects on the cardiovascular,
neurological and reproductive systems as well.
They are nothing short of
MANDATORY PROGRESSIVE EUTHANASIA.
neurological and reproductive systems as well.
They are nothing short of
MANDATORY PROGRESSIVE EUTHANASIA.
In fact, CDC All-Cause Mortality data show that each vaccine dose increased mortality by 7% in the year 2022 compared to the mortality in year 2021.
So if you have had 5 doses then you were 35% more likely to die in 2022 than you were in 2021. If you have had one dose then you were 7% more likely to die in 2022 than you were in 2021.
So if you have had 5 doses then you were 35% more likely to die in 2022 than you were in 2021. If you have had one dose then you were 7% more likely to die in 2022 than you were in 2021.
IF YOU ARE UNVAXXED,
you were no more likely to die in 2022 than you were in 2021.
CDC All-Cause Mortality Data shows that every year, every vaccinated person becomes more and more likely to die at a rate of 7% PER JAB PER YEAR. That is a slow-acting genetic poison.
If people were recovering from the 1st jab, then it would not be having precisely the same effect as the 5th jab (namely a 7% increase in mortality). This is the long term problem. People are not recovering from the damage done by the shots in terms of excess mortality.
So taking 2021 as the base line, a 5 dosed person would be 350% more likely to die in 2031 and 700% more likely to die in 2041 and 1050% more likely to die in 2051 than an unvaxxed person. It is just like compound interest.
Using this result, we can calculate the loss in life expectancy for a 30 year old male as follows… The life expectancy of a 30 year old unvaxxed male in the UK is around 80 years. So he can expect another 50 years of life.
In statistical terms, half of his cohort are dead by 80. The life expectancy of a 30 year old quintuply vaxxed person in the UK is 56 years. Assuming UK males respond to the vaccines in the same way as US people. Alternatively quintuply vaxxed US 30 year old males have likewise lost 24 years of life expectancy.
UK life expectancy data is from Statista. In the table below we add the extra 7% mortality per jab per year to the 2020 UK levels shown in Column 2. So in a 5 year period, the average increase in expected mortality would be –
If people were recovering from the 1st jab, then it would not be having precisely the same effect as the 5th jab (namely a 7% increase in mortality). This is the long term problem. People are not recovering from the damage done by the shots in terms of excess mortality.
So taking 2021 as the base line, a 5 dosed person would be 350% more likely to die in 2031 and 700% more likely to die in 2041 and 1050% more likely to die in 2051 than an unvaxxed person. It is just like compound interest.
Using this result, we can calculate the loss in life expectancy for a 30 year old male as follows… The life expectancy of a 30 year old unvaxxed male in the UK is around 80 years. So he can expect another 50 years of life.
In statistical terms, half of his cohort are dead by 80. The life expectancy of a 30 year old quintuply vaxxed person in the UK is 56 years. Assuming UK males respond to the vaccines in the same way as US people. Alternatively quintuply vaxxed US 30 year old males have likewise lost 24 years of life expectancy.
UK life expectancy data is from Statista. In the table below we add the extra 7% mortality per jab per year to the 2020 UK levels shown in Column 2. So in a 5 year period, the average increase in expected mortality would be –
(0% + 35%)/2 = 17.5% from one jab
(0% + 70%)/2 = 35% from two jabs
(0% + 105%)/2 = 52.5% from three jabs
(0% + 140%)/2 = 70% from four jabs
(0% + 175%)/2 = 87.5% from five jabs
(0% + 70%)/2 = 35% from two jabs
(0% + 105%)/2 = 52.5% from three jabs
(0% + 140%)/2 = 70% from four jabs
(0% + 175%)/2 = 87.5% from five jabs
Life Expectancy for unvaxxed and 1-5 dosed UK males:
1 jab robs 30 year old men of 13 years
2 jabs robs 30 year old men of 18 years
3 jabs robs 30 year old men of 20 years
4 jabs robs 30 year old men of 23 years
5 jabs robs 30 year old men of 24 years
Personally, I would bear in mind that these are long term conclusions that are extrapolated from just the last two years of all-cause mortality statistics in the UK. Given the accelerating pace of sudden death cases and skyrocketing cancer, miscarriage and infertility rates in both males and females in the US and elsewhere,
the reality will likely turn out to be far more grim. -John
2 jabs robs 30 year old men of 18 years
3 jabs robs 30 year old men of 20 years
4 jabs robs 30 year old men of 23 years
5 jabs robs 30 year old men of 24 years
Personally, I would bear in mind that these are long term conclusions that are extrapolated from just the last two years of all-cause mortality statistics in the UK. Given the accelerating pace of sudden death cases and skyrocketing cancer, miscarriage and infertility rates in both males and females in the US and elsewhere,
the reality will likely turn out to be far more grim. -John
That is the price you pay for trusting the NHS, trusting the government and trusting the BBC and the Main Stream Media.
The continuation of the pandemic
is entirely caused by the anti vaccines.
is entirely caused by the anti vaccines.
"Better to scare everyone out of their wits so we can get on with doing witless things."
DR. DAVID NIXON AND ENGINEER SHIMON YANOWITZ C19 SHOTS NANOTECHNOLOGY AND SHEDDING UPDATES
https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/dr-david-nixon-and-engineer-shimon?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
Revisiting earlier debates on shedding, this is a good example of shedding evidence. It does not negate any of my previous statements about the impossibility of anything organic passing between people, but it does present evidence that the contents of vaccine vials contain material that can pose a hazard to those who study it in a laboratory setting, and they get into this fairly fast after the first ten minutes or so.
What this suggests is that vaccinated people, as hosts for this material, are in fact able to excrete this stuff and contaminate others, HOWEVER, I am still waiting to see this proven scientifically, not just anecdotally. It HAS to be proven, not simply assumed to be taking place, and the reason for this has more to do with the severity of the risk than the risk itself.
Acetone, for example, is a toxic chemical. Nobody questions that, and washing your hands off with it as I frequently do is not a good practice. Some amount of that does permeate the skin and therefore contaminates my body, but it doesn't have much of an effect on me beyond irritated skin.
Anything the body absorbs will eventually be expelled if its not supposed to be there, so this includes any toxic vaccine related material. The fact that not everyone is uniformly sensitive to that material is arguably inconsequential if the material itself is universally toxic, and that I believe is true.
The question then becomes one of upper level toxicity, or what amount is considered to be lethal or potentially lethal if the exposure results as any form of progressive illness. Exposures in amounts that are tolerable and relatively harmless, either because they produce no immediate measurable symptomatic response or because they do, but as a result of such exposure only result in the presentation of mild symptomology of a relatively temporary nature, while cause for concern, are not as serious as a cumulative buildup of unexpellable, potentially self-replicating material that could result in chronic health complaints in the unvaccinated.
If an immunologically healthy individual is biologically able to successfully defend against even routine exposure I would tend to view the possibility that vaccinated people could pose a tangible threat, dangerous to unvaccinated people, as a manageable risk. I think one thing we can reasonably assume, given their pattern of behavior, is that the creators of this bioweapon were hoping for was a self spreading vaccine that would have the capability to compromise those of us that refuse to vaccinate ourselves directly. The question still remains as to how successful they were in that endeavor, and it may be a while yet before we know with any certainty.
What I will tell you is up until I saw this I was willing to personally examine some covid vaccine vial contents were I ever to have such an opportunity to do so. I now think that would not be very wise to do with the setup I currently have. Were I to obtain any I think I would only consider doing that donning appropriate hazmat gear and in an open air or strictly controlled environment, like a negative pressure spray paint booth. I would also opt not to view the slides directly as Shimon and others have done, but rather from a safe distance with a digital optical microscope eyepiece. Given the evidence Shimon presents here, I think there is reason enough to consider any direct examination of the vaccine material itself to carry an extreme risk of long term personal injury.
As far as the direct examination of vaccine vial content, I think that is probably best left to people with proper labs and protections.
As far as vaccinated people go, I just refuse to live in a self isolating bubble, meaning whatever happens as a result on mingling socially with vaccinated people will most likely involve me at some point. I don't see any way to completely, or even somewhat effectively, isolate myself from the vaccinated population. I mean, let's face it, they are everywhere. How could anyone possibly do that? I think having sexual relations with them carries more risk than not, so that is one area we all have a bit more control over, but people frequently lie to get with others, so its not 100% possible to avoid if you intend to be sexually active.
The extent of our personal contact with vaccinated people will always be a personal decision each of us will likely have to face at some point for the foreseeable future, which will unfortunately be the case for the remainder of our natural lives. At my age, I really feel it matters less to me than it would were I twenty five years younger and still considering starting a family. I have confidence in my body, and any healthy body's ability, to adeptly deal with pathogenic material, so to my way of thinking the best defense is still a good offense. There has never been a better time to BE healthy.
I would add that since all cause mortality has thus far been stable for the unvaccinated, this tends to favor the possibility that the vaccinated do not pose any significant exposure risk, however this appears at least not to be true for certain sensitive individuals that continue to report anecdotally that they feel unwell following contact with vaccinated people.
In my research I have come to learn that this effect is most likely time dependent. We know that the most toxic material is delivered within lipid nanoparticle envelopes and that those envelopes have a stability issue that gives them a maximum shelf life of about three months from the date of manufacture, so logically speaking, it is during this time, when these LNP's are degrading within the body, that the risk of shedding this material is most likely the highest. If you are among those that believe themselves to be unusually sensitive, avoiding recently vaccinated people, to the extent one is able to so so, is probably the only course of action available to you.
I will finish up this post with something I was happy to see happen finally.
DR. BRIAN ARDIS (OF SNAKE VENOM VACCINE FAME) DESTROYS HIMSELF AS A COMPETENT RESEARCHER.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/iZwBEZ78o67a/
Ever since Dr. Bryan Ardis began this ridiculous fear campaign, claiming that everything was full of snake venom, I have steadfastly refused to give him, and this concept, the slightest bit of consideration, and I have fielded a number of concerns from people who felt I should have paid more attention to it.
If you still are among those who believe Dr. Ardis is anything more than a celebrity pseudo-pro, watching the credibility of his work being systematically eviscerated by Tom Cowan and Andrew Kaufman should remove all doubt.
I cannot stress this enough -- Just because a guy has successfully managed to earn the title of "doctor of medicine" that alone, in no way, qualifies him to do competent medical research. Just follow along with Tom and Andrew after Tom justifiably interrupts his well practiced venom paranoia speech and starts recreating the chain of events that led Dr. Ardis to his conclusions.
It is a pristine example of how NOT to go about this sort of work.
If you still are among those who believe Dr. Ardis is anything more than a celebrity pseudo-pro, watching the credibility of his work being systematically eviscerated by Tom Cowan and Andrew Kaufman should remove all doubt.
I cannot stress this enough -- Just because a guy has successfully managed to earn the title of "doctor of medicine" that alone, in no way, qualifies him to do competent medical research. Just follow along with Tom and Andrew after Tom justifiably interrupts his well practiced venom paranoia speech and starts recreating the chain of events that led Dr. Ardis to his conclusions.
It is a pristine example of how NOT to go about this sort of work.
RSS Feed