Ok, so apparently there is a bit of a disagreement between these two about who deserves the blame for openly unleashing biological warfare on the world with fake pandemics and poison vaccines. On the one side there is Sasha Latypova and Catherine Watt. Their presentation is called "Intent to Harm" and I posted links to it I previous articles. This is the current state of their understanding, following a very deep, highly detailed and well supported investigation that concluded the head of the snake behind all this is the US Government, specifically the DOD. That this has been a military operation (aka Warp Speed) since the beginning, and that this is who we should all sue and blame, etc.
Karen then came out with a similar investigation, equal depth, detail, lots of references and all that, which points the finger squarely at Pfizer. Karen makes a compelling case that includes specific language in contracts between the US Government and Pfizer which, among other things, indicate that Pfizer is not only the head of the snake, but has been all along, even to such an extent that it has been given authorities, advantages and even powers, that historically have only ever been available to the US Government. In other words, Pfizer is the government now.
I have seen both presentations, I have been able to question both Sasha and Karen directly, and I honestly don't know which one is correct. This is a legal question that might only be resolved by someone on the order of Dr. David Martin or Reiner Fuellmich I would think. But I have to say, Karen is no slouch picking this contract apart. At the end of the day I think she may turn out to be correct.
What I cannot understand for the life of me is why these two cannot collaborate amicably. I made that suggestion to Karen last week. I have also suggested it to Sasha. Clearly my advice is not all that important, because I was quite shocked to hear Karen a few days later carrying on in a Stew Peters interview where she lashed out at Sasha as part of the problem, even to the extent of implying in a thinly veiled manner that she is somehow a bad actor in this for promoting the position she did! I heard through the grapevine Sasha did in fact reach out to Kingston but was ignored, and that Kingston unsubscribed from Sasha's substack.
Can't confirm either thing. This just feels petty to me.
Now, for the record, I don't see Sasha as a bad actor at all. I chock this up to an ego trip Karen is on. She is very qualified and equally aggressive in her attacks on Pfizer and is currently taking this fight, state by state, to their doorstep.
That should make everyone feel pretty well represented in my opinion.
Still, we are all on the same team here, trying to stop this, and I see guilt and collusion everywhere.
Can't we all just get along? Focus on the victims, and the defense of all of our basic human rights, and lop the head off every snake we can? I am all for going after both villains, there is more than enough to warrant that. Nobody even marginally culpable of this mass genocide is going to get away with their skin in tact when we finally get this all sorted, and we will, I believe that.
Karen then came out with a similar investigation, equal depth, detail, lots of references and all that, which points the finger squarely at Pfizer. Karen makes a compelling case that includes specific language in contracts between the US Government and Pfizer which, among other things, indicate that Pfizer is not only the head of the snake, but has been all along, even to such an extent that it has been given authorities, advantages and even powers, that historically have only ever been available to the US Government. In other words, Pfizer is the government now.
I have seen both presentations, I have been able to question both Sasha and Karen directly, and I honestly don't know which one is correct. This is a legal question that might only be resolved by someone on the order of Dr. David Martin or Reiner Fuellmich I would think. But I have to say, Karen is no slouch picking this contract apart. At the end of the day I think she may turn out to be correct.
What I cannot understand for the life of me is why these two cannot collaborate amicably. I made that suggestion to Karen last week. I have also suggested it to Sasha. Clearly my advice is not all that important, because I was quite shocked to hear Karen a few days later carrying on in a Stew Peters interview where she lashed out at Sasha as part of the problem, even to the extent of implying in a thinly veiled manner that she is somehow a bad actor in this for promoting the position she did! I heard through the grapevine Sasha did in fact reach out to Kingston but was ignored, and that Kingston unsubscribed from Sasha's substack.
Can't confirm either thing. This just feels petty to me.
Now, for the record, I don't see Sasha as a bad actor at all. I chock this up to an ego trip Karen is on. She is very qualified and equally aggressive in her attacks on Pfizer and is currently taking this fight, state by state, to their doorstep.
That should make everyone feel pretty well represented in my opinion.
Still, we are all on the same team here, trying to stop this, and I see guilt and collusion everywhere.
Can't we all just get along? Focus on the victims, and the defense of all of our basic human rights, and lop the head off every snake we can? I am all for going after both villains, there is more than enough to warrant that. Nobody even marginally culpable of this mass genocide is going to get away with their skin in tact when we finally get this all sorted, and we will, I believe that.
WHAT DO YOU GET WHEN YOU CROSS SASHA LATYPOVA WITH "DR." JANE RUBY?
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/conversation-with-dr-jane-ruby
Haha Ruby wakes up a bit... finally. It took a brisk slap across her face, but nice to see. Here's what I find interesting about this; Jane Ruby is one of Stew Peters little darlings and a regular guest. Now, I have always suspected Stew to be a slick form of controlled opposition, even though he interviewed me once. Pretty much anyone with an audience of that size is subject to suspicion. You just cannot have a sizable public reach without being "approved". I don't watch his show because its mostly fear mongering crap, so I was not aware he bashed Sasha Latypova calling her a pharma shill, which is utterly ridiculous on its face, but now that Stew has blown his cover it will be interested to see what types of Jane Ruby material he offers viewers after this. If Jane's favored guest status is downgraded a bit or eliminated altogether that is what I am watching for (occasionally, when I have time to do so).
DISMANTLING COVID-19 DECEPTIONS: THE 'NOVEL' CORONAVIRUS & 'SPIKE PROTEIN' - Kingston Report
https://karenkingston.substack.com/p/part-1-dismantling-the-the-deceptions?utm_source=cross-post&publication_id=1103773&post_id=74957462&isFreemail=true&utm_campaign=956088&utm_medium=email
REGULATING WEAPONIZED NANOTECHNOLOGY: HOW THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT OFFERS A WAY FORWARD
https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/regulating-weaponized-nanotechnology?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
Thanks for the mention, Ana.
TRANSCENDING THE PLANDEMIC NARRATIVE - Dr. Andrew Kaufman
https://andrewkaufmanmd.com/transcending-the-plandemic-narrative-with-dr-andrew-kaufman/?_kx=lhqkk9NuHFy8W05sYZuhrgVXfhvA-Xg9IUVHrngBV6E%3D.UpXyYd
If you have just learned the pandemic was a big lie, this is a must see. For those of you that know it’s a big lie but have trouble selling that concept to a person with a 30 second attention span, of even a brainwashed vaccine zealot its even better, because right off the bat he explains how you recognize a circular argument. This is when you begin with a claim and later the exact claim is found in your conclusions. One does not support the other. This is repetition, not analysis, and its not scientific, it doesn’t prove anything, but it is how you create propaganda people can remember. It is a good lecture, chock full of quick rebukes of everything we know is wrong. Props to Andrew for this one. He nails it, all of it.
DR. DAVID NIXON - NANOTECH INSIDE INJECTED AND UNINJECTED DISAPPEARS WITH COLLOIDAL GOLD
https://www.bitchute.com/video/DqcRv5Ej5J0N/?list=subscriptions
This is a new discovery. Seems they are few and far between, but this one might end up being a big deal, however, you have to really listen to be clear on what Nixon knows and doesn't know. He doesn't really know what he is observing. It appears to him that the vaccine sample, with all its nanotech doing whatever it is doing, stops because it "dries up". This is not the same as "destroyed", so the question about whether or not you want to go taking colloidal gold is still open. I would advise trying it, in safe amounts, if you want to. Just a couple drops under the tongue is what he says to do. No reason not to, but I have been told by others that there is a "rebound effect" In other words, it not gone, its frozen in place, I assume temporarily. I am assuming it just re-hydrates and begins its job again in vivo, but we'll watch what comes out of Nixon's experiments as he goes along to see what else he learns about this.
Apology Accepted…
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Z5qJKPIRstr4/?list=subscriptions
Talk about someone setting a proper example. Never thought I'd see this level of honesty again in my lifetime. Thanks for restoring my faith today, Scott.
CARBON CREDITS ARE THE BIGGEST SCAM SINCE INDULGENCES
https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/carbon-credits-are-biggest-scam-indulgences-how-you-can-avoid-being-fleeced
Although advocates promote them as a way to “save the environment,” in reality, carbon credits are nothing more than a devious mechanism to tax, regulate, and control you.
It’s not a coincidence that the most philosophically and ethically bent people are promoting them.
Think of it like this…
Imagine if Tony Soprano forced everyone in his neighborhood to buy “breathing credits” from him, which grant you the privilege to breathe a certain amount of air. And that, naturally, it would cost Tony Soprano nothing to create as many of these “breathing credits” as he wanted. He could also hand them out to his friends and others who did favors for him, creating a corrupt patronage system.
This is basically what governments plan to do with carbon credits. Except they are also gas lighting you by telling you they are helping save the planet.
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/conversation-with-dr-jane-ruby
Haha Ruby wakes up a bit... finally. It took a brisk slap across her face, but nice to see. Here's what I find interesting about this; Jane Ruby is one of Stew Peters little darlings and a regular guest. Now, I have always suspected Stew to be a slick form of controlled opposition, even though he interviewed me once. Pretty much anyone with an audience of that size is subject to suspicion. You just cannot have a sizable public reach without being "approved". I don't watch his show because its mostly fear mongering crap, so I was not aware he bashed Sasha Latypova calling her a pharma shill, which is utterly ridiculous on its face, but now that Stew has blown his cover it will be interested to see what types of Jane Ruby material he offers viewers after this. If Jane's favored guest status is downgraded a bit or eliminated altogether that is what I am watching for (occasionally, when I have time to do so).
DISMANTLING COVID-19 DECEPTIONS: THE 'NOVEL' CORONAVIRUS & 'SPIKE PROTEIN' - Kingston Report
https://karenkingston.substack.com/p/part-1-dismantling-the-the-deceptions?utm_source=cross-post&publication_id=1103773&post_id=74957462&isFreemail=true&utm_campaign=956088&utm_medium=email
REGULATING WEAPONIZED NANOTECHNOLOGY: HOW THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT OFFERS A WAY FORWARD
https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/regulating-weaponized-nanotechnology?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
Thanks for the mention, Ana.
TRANSCENDING THE PLANDEMIC NARRATIVE - Dr. Andrew Kaufman
https://andrewkaufmanmd.com/transcending-the-plandemic-narrative-with-dr-andrew-kaufman/?_kx=lhqkk9NuHFy8W05sYZuhrgVXfhvA-Xg9IUVHrngBV6E%3D.UpXyYd
If you have just learned the pandemic was a big lie, this is a must see. For those of you that know it’s a big lie but have trouble selling that concept to a person with a 30 second attention span, of even a brainwashed vaccine zealot its even better, because right off the bat he explains how you recognize a circular argument. This is when you begin with a claim and later the exact claim is found in your conclusions. One does not support the other. This is repetition, not analysis, and its not scientific, it doesn’t prove anything, but it is how you create propaganda people can remember. It is a good lecture, chock full of quick rebukes of everything we know is wrong. Props to Andrew for this one. He nails it, all of it.
DR. DAVID NIXON - NANOTECH INSIDE INJECTED AND UNINJECTED DISAPPEARS WITH COLLOIDAL GOLD
https://www.bitchute.com/video/DqcRv5Ej5J0N/?list=subscriptions
This is a new discovery. Seems they are few and far between, but this one might end up being a big deal, however, you have to really listen to be clear on what Nixon knows and doesn't know. He doesn't really know what he is observing. It appears to him that the vaccine sample, with all its nanotech doing whatever it is doing, stops because it "dries up". This is not the same as "destroyed", so the question about whether or not you want to go taking colloidal gold is still open. I would advise trying it, in safe amounts, if you want to. Just a couple drops under the tongue is what he says to do. No reason not to, but I have been told by others that there is a "rebound effect" In other words, it not gone, its frozen in place, I assume temporarily. I am assuming it just re-hydrates and begins its job again in vivo, but we'll watch what comes out of Nixon's experiments as he goes along to see what else he learns about this.
Apology Accepted…
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Z5qJKPIRstr4/?list=subscriptions
Talk about someone setting a proper example. Never thought I'd see this level of honesty again in my lifetime. Thanks for restoring my faith today, Scott.
CARBON CREDITS ARE THE BIGGEST SCAM SINCE INDULGENCES
https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/carbon-credits-are-biggest-scam-indulgences-how-you-can-avoid-being-fleeced
Although advocates promote them as a way to “save the environment,” in reality, carbon credits are nothing more than a devious mechanism to tax, regulate, and control you.
It’s not a coincidence that the most philosophically and ethically bent people are promoting them.
Think of it like this…
Imagine if Tony Soprano forced everyone in his neighborhood to buy “breathing credits” from him, which grant you the privilege to breathe a certain amount of air. And that, naturally, it would cost Tony Soprano nothing to create as many of these “breathing credits” as he wanted. He could also hand them out to his friends and others who did favors for him, creating a corrupt patronage system.
This is basically what governments plan to do with carbon credits. Except they are also gas lighting you by telling you they are helping save the planet.
RSS Feed