Someone please explain to me how we know for a fact Assad did what we are being told he did. I can't get a straight answer on this is seems regardless of who I am looking to for a reasonable answer. "We have it on the best sources" doesn't cut it. There's way too many suspicious things going on here. RT just aired a broadcast interviewing an MIT professor who examined the bombing site and concluded this event was faked and explains in detail why and how. In short, the bomb casing remains which were clearly shown in this piece are that of an improvised casing made not of some ordinance you release from an aircraft as the story goes but rather it is a hunk of pipe that contained a home-made sarin gas chemical that did not release its contents due to being exploded outwards as an air dropped ordinance would but rather it was released by being run over and crushed by a tank or something similar. This professor is here in the US so we can just drop the Russian hacking crap right now and it doesn't take an expert to make this simple point since any idiot can see that from the photos that were released. He did go on to make several other less obvious observations that do require a trained expert to make but the level of detail he provided overwhelmingly supports his assertion this event was staged to give someone an excuse to engage over there. People... please do not trust the media on this. They are telling bald faced lies to you. Do some digging on your own. this whole situation stinks to high heaven. But wait, there's more...
According to Lee Stranahan of the Populist, intel that Assad gassed his own people came from The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights which is actually a single guy who owns a clothing store in the UK who also happens to be a Sunni Muslim so that whole lofty sounding think tank is one guy selling pants someplace!
His point in this is the comparison to the last time Assad was accused of gassing his own citizens, and then theres how Michael Flynn handled a direct inquiry by a press guy who doubted the narrative then.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWVypQxSQ_U <<---WATCH THIS CLIP
You can't help but notice what a jackass Flynn is ya know? Just listen to the guy stutter as he tries to chew gum and think up a halfway decent dodge ball; Good Lord!" I'm, I'm, listen, because I'm gonna answer your question...words words, words. I cant answer your question but fear, fear , stay up at night, incredibly complex fear...good question I respect your question. and you, great question, we cant know tho because words words, fear, future fear..., misery destruction and death. Thank you.
Who can listen to that garbage outside of the actual time of the event? Why are we falling for this again? Did you play the entire response? Be honest. Theres more real intel in a 90 minute hydroxycut infomercial!
And right up front that reveal about who the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights actually is. You know this is something I see way too much of. A lofty sounding think tank name that conjures up mental images of a 4 story office building full of conference rooms, libraries, plasma screens and suits that just breezes by everyone's scrutiny which is quoted as saying something credible that led to the spending of a billion dollars of hyperactive US war machine and eventually somebody goes to the effort to learn we just bombed another country based on a phone call from a thrift store in London.
I'm not going to apologize for having my doubts about this when more often than not just a couple years after an event, or when the same event repeats, a lone journalist needs to run to You Tube to do his job because his news organization refuses to air the fact a war was started over evidence that is utter shit and neither should any of you. And I get attacked for even bringing stuff like this up with people involved with politics.
When is it ok to question anything?
Apparently we're not supposed to.
Well, at least there was one brief light in all this cyanide smoke and wavy carnival mirrors. We won't be subjected to anymore of Bill 'BLOWHARD" O'Reily. God I have so wished that guy would have a stroke and spare us his arrogant blather. It offends me that he is peddled out to represent this countries conservatives. I know there is a whole insanely long story there but frankly I don't even care how it happened, I'm just glad I won't need to walk past another 40 inch plasma screen with his smug face on it calling out everyone beneath his level of supremacy. Bbye Scroty McBoogerballs!
I hope a gay intern slapped him on the ass on the way out. I really do.
According to Lee Stranahan of the Populist, intel that Assad gassed his own people came from The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights which is actually a single guy who owns a clothing store in the UK who also happens to be a Sunni Muslim so that whole lofty sounding think tank is one guy selling pants someplace!
His point in this is the comparison to the last time Assad was accused of gassing his own citizens, and then theres how Michael Flynn handled a direct inquiry by a press guy who doubted the narrative then.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWVypQxSQ_U <<---WATCH THIS CLIP
You can't help but notice what a jackass Flynn is ya know? Just listen to the guy stutter as he tries to chew gum and think up a halfway decent dodge ball; Good Lord!" I'm, I'm, listen, because I'm gonna answer your question...words words, words. I cant answer your question but fear, fear , stay up at night, incredibly complex fear...good question I respect your question. and you, great question, we cant know tho because words words, fear, future fear..., misery destruction and death. Thank you.
Who can listen to that garbage outside of the actual time of the event? Why are we falling for this again? Did you play the entire response? Be honest. Theres more real intel in a 90 minute hydroxycut infomercial!
And right up front that reveal about who the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights actually is. You know this is something I see way too much of. A lofty sounding think tank name that conjures up mental images of a 4 story office building full of conference rooms, libraries, plasma screens and suits that just breezes by everyone's scrutiny which is quoted as saying something credible that led to the spending of a billion dollars of hyperactive US war machine and eventually somebody goes to the effort to learn we just bombed another country based on a phone call from a thrift store in London.
I'm not going to apologize for having my doubts about this when more often than not just a couple years after an event, or when the same event repeats, a lone journalist needs to run to You Tube to do his job because his news organization refuses to air the fact a war was started over evidence that is utter shit and neither should any of you. And I get attacked for even bringing stuff like this up with people involved with politics.
When is it ok to question anything?
Apparently we're not supposed to.
Well, at least there was one brief light in all this cyanide smoke and wavy carnival mirrors. We won't be subjected to anymore of Bill 'BLOWHARD" O'Reily. God I have so wished that guy would have a stroke and spare us his arrogant blather. It offends me that he is peddled out to represent this countries conservatives. I know there is a whole insanely long story there but frankly I don't even care how it happened, I'm just glad I won't need to walk past another 40 inch plasma screen with his smug face on it calling out everyone beneath his level of supremacy. Bbye Scroty McBoogerballs!
I hope a gay intern slapped him on the ass on the way out. I really do.
RSS Feed